|
|
 | | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
| (...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version. There are also some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) tanders.dat - Original title "My Home", made by me, free to use under any license. It was originally built in BlockCAD when the world travelling minifigs Colin & Wanda visited me in 1999. (URL) - Original title "My little summer house", but (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) You're assuming that TLC actually took cues from MB in terms of how to fix their business model. In terms of the AFOL market, all it meant to TLC was that their customers stopped buying as much stuff, not that they started buying the (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) Here's a better question. If that had been the case, would anyone have even had the desire to attempt to clone MB at all? There are several different construction toy systems out there, and so far the only one I've really seen any non-bootleg (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.statistics (Skip-filter settings)
|
