 | | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Seems OK to me, but I don't like "circular" too much. Rounded, perhaps? Philo (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Hmm.. maybe I should really think another three dozen times more about what I propose. 32174.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Circular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Rectangular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Double 5 x 2 (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Not being a part author, I can't comment on the utility, but to me the naming is confusing. The base cylinder primitives are already open at both ends; they just don't have edges there. So to me, cyle would make more since in the filename, and (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) I think it's a bad idea to have the double-socket parts be named so similarly to the single-socket parts. The double-socket parts are beams with sockets on either end, whereas the single socket parts are sockets with connectors out the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(URL) Hi all - I'm currently working on the rectangular ball joint sockets and the naming issue (which I have tried to rise up a couple of times) is to me becoming a little critical. What I'd like is to unify the titles of all seven variants: the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
