To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *568670 (-10)
  Re: Has Anyone Tried This and Will it Work?
 
(...) I think the real intent was not so much installing a second motor, but actually powering the PF motor, or even a second PF motor from the 9V rail. Using the 9V truck to pick up power from the track and using the 8886 extension wire to convert (...) (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: LPub Bad results with LDView
 
(...) uses the opengl hardware on the video card to do the offscreen rendering. Maybe the card is running out of memory at the higher dpi? What does LDView report about your opengl driver? Maybe that'll provide a clue. (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Has Anyone Tried This and Will it Work?
 
(...) Interesting idea, Clifton. I would be very interested to see if this works and if it is 'safe' for the motors. One thing to keep in mind though is that 9V motor failure tends to be more tied to the internal power leads that connect the wheels (...) (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Copyright notice concerning Brickmania / Daniel Siskind's models.
 
(...) Tiffeny: Check out (URL) to purchase Dan's sets. He's also got a cool subscription deal for an 'Instruction of the Month' club. Enjoy! -Dave ToT-LUG (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.market.theory, FTX)
 
  Re: LPub Bad results with LDView
 
(...) Sounds not good. At present I have no idea what the problem could cause. But LDView should not be the problem as you can see the parts correctly there. So it has to be the connection between both. Did you try in LPub - "Clear assembly image (...) (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LPub Bad results with LDView
 
(...) Full version information of LDView was 4.0 beta 1 (1 Dec. 2008) I have now updated to LDView 4.0.1 (7.Feb.2009) but the colouring problem persists. (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LPub Bad results with LDView
 
(...) As I do not have LPub 4.0.0.2 I can not give good comments. Is LDView 4.0.1 (7.Feb.2009) ? (only to be sure to compare the right things.) cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LPub Bad results with LDView
 
(...) Sorry for the omission. I'm using LPub 4.0.0.2 and LDView 4.0.1 on Windows XP Pro SP3 (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Taj Mahal MOC and TAJ the movie
 
(...) Wow! This is a fantastic MOC! Is the top of the front left minnaret supposed to be one round 2x2 plate shorter? (under the 2x2 dome piece?) I don't know why, I just noticed it. Good scaled down dome, forms & colors/textures! Jeff (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
 
  Re: Taj Mahal MOC and TAJ the movie
 
(...) This microscale version is excellent!! Great work, Arthur! "Big Daddy" Nelson (15 years ago, 11-Jun-09, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)

Skipped 1 message in group lugnet.off-topic.test (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR