 | | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
(...) Please let your wife know that she has *really* cool tastes in anniversary gifts :). (...) I still like it quite a bit, but it seems among adults I'm a minority (or an aberration... I've been called worse). I agree that the bugs in the IDE in (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Help writing LDraw's history
|
|
(...) Jean-Marc came back to me today with an interesting solution I think might work. See (URL) Click on MLCad's ball, then "Details" within the window. The specific versions will appear in the large band below. What does everyone think about this? (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
Given the frustrations I've had, I can't agree with the "10/10" ease of use rating that the BotMag comparison ( (URL) ) gave NXT-G. However, it does show that RobotC is, apparently, twice as easy to use as NXJ and NXC; that might be enough for me. (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
(...) Thanks. That's why it's there. I can't tell you which one to use, but hopefully you've been able to mark a few off your list. (...) I've been using RobotC, because I'm doing stuff with Bluetooth that's simply not possible with the standard (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
It would seem RobotC and NXJ are about equal for the kinds of things I'm trying to do. Like many developers, I find coding without a full-featured IDE to be a bit painful. (I know this means that I am trading convenience for deep language knowledge, (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
