 | | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
Given the frustrations I've had, I can't agree with the "10/10" ease of use rating that the BotMag comparison ( (URL) ) gave NXT-G. However, it does show that RobotC is, apparently, twice as easy to use as NXJ and NXC; that might be enough for me. (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
(...) Thanks. That's why it's there. I can't tell you which one to use, but hopefully you've been able to mark a few off your list. (...) I've been using RobotC, because I'm doing stuff with Bluetooth that's simply not possible with the standard (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
It would seem RobotC and NXJ are about equal for the kinds of things I'm trying to do. Like many developers, I find coding without a full-featured IDE to be a bit painful. (I know this means that I am trading convenience for deep language knowledge, (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon
|
|
(...) Thank you Jon Sandro (17 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Bruce S. Chamberlain wrote: Hello Bruce, (...) Thank you for the praise. In fact those armor elements were what catched my eye at first too. (...) Sandro immediately followed your suggestion and was really happy about the (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
