 | | Re: New Tutorial - LDD->LDraw and LDraw->LDD conversion
|
|
(...) I checked the helpdesk's archive but there is no trace of your mail. (...) the LDraw number for 6211 is 73590b.dat - Hose Flexible 8.5L with Tabs (Complete Assembly Shortcut) and the part is an official part since 1999. obviously it is a (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll for new Town Sets
|
|
(...) fixed at this time. If not, how about a gun store, reference the discussion on weapons. Or a liquor store or maybe a large movie theater. A drive in. or a very large bridge. You might want to look at all the old store displays. The directions (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.ambassadors)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . .
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Elroy Davis wrote: -snip- (...) On the topic of fun, classification, and yard work, have you tried John Allen's Timesaver switching puzzle? It's very compatible with LEGO. A version I created is available here: (URL) The nice think (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . .
|
|
The layout looks great (you will be so much happier with it when it's up on a table)! It's really hard to resist the temptation to make a loop, but point-to-point layouts have many more interesting possibilities. I think you'll be having fun with (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll for new Town Sets
|
|
(...) This is a big reason that LEGO has always had a hard time marketing to girls. LEGO town/city has always been too action-oriented, and that simply doesn't appeal to girls . . . at least not to the extent that action appeals to boys. Sets that (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego on Google
|
|
(...) What a coincidence. I just noticed that Lugnet now features Google ads. (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale Modelers Aren't the Only Ones . . .
|
|
(...) Using a standard #1 knuckle coupler is an interesting idea. But instead of using the raw shank version, why not go with one that is mounted in a draft gear box? A little epoxy or MEK could probably mount the draft gear box on a hacked brick. (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: More LEGO anniversary geekiness...
|
|
(...) Bricklink agrees with you on the 1975 issue, but not on 1977 for articulated minifigs. Peeron does, however, list a whopping four sets that included articulated smiley-figs in '77. Of equal significance is the fact that they show a Castle from (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More LEGO anniversary geekiness...
|
|
(...) As far as you know. JOHN (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: More LEGO anniversary geekiness...
|
|
(...) And God had nothing to do with it! Unless God is just short for "Godtfred"... ROSCO (17 years ago, 28-Jan-08, to lugnet.general)
|
