|
|
 | | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
| I whole heartedly agree. In fact, I don't think I will be buying anymore sets unless I see a return to the basics. I *might* buy the 8275 Bulldozer but it too seems to have too many studless beams and liftarms for my taste. "Paul Sinasohn" (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: PreL3P 1.0
|
| (...) Great! Thank you for the suggestion. Jim (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Rutland Boxcar #104
|
| (...) [...] (...) because I usually build with the bricks at hand, and I don't have many of those windshields. Chris (17 years ago, 10-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Precedent!
|
| (...) Don't sell yourself short. You're a tremendous slouch :) Chris (17 years ago, 10-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: ...was - my robot works
|
| (...) Im ok with all this. thanks for the quick reply. (...) well, we have pretty mush geared the game to highest/farthest/wall, to change it to fastest 2 days before game day might not be fair. (...) well, I ~guess~ it would be ok. shrug. I mean, i (...) (17 years ago, 10-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
