 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) You are right, the main limitation probably comes from wall wart... You are essentially right for the 0.7A current (though it is not hard limit, rather a safety one). Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) To me, the reasons are mainly "historical": the first way to get better images than the output of Ldraw/MLCad/LeoCAD (which is not that bad for instructions!) was POV-Ray. L3PAO then LPub did a lot to push POV as the renderer of choice. Add to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
Here are a few of my ideas: robotic arm (advanced version of set #8094) carnival rides (set #4957 is a good start) areal cable car (similar to the one in idea book #8889) remote controlled hovercraft (could be moving around on wheels) airplane with (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) A very important point - I didn't even noticed that the vehicle roof was grey, not white! (...) That's the main problem of LDD generated instructions: no edges... Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
(...) Hi Kelly, thanks for dropping in. I didn't vote becasue i would buy anything. I deliberate on aspects such as parts and colour availability but the end result is a purchase. Even if it contains blue axle pins. I think you should produce all (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: ARM Assembly Language Programming on NXT?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip. I glanced at (URL) previously but I must've missed it thinking it's Java based. (...) Are you referring to the default NXT firmware or the LEJOS NXJ/OSEK firmware? (...) You're right, I've come across several ARM-based SBC (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) It'll be there in the next release. (...) Actually, if you look you will see that parts of it are somewhat transparent (like the left edge of the windscreen). All of it that has the background visible through transparent parts is supposed to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | peeron inventory corrections
|
|
Oct 8 1786-1: Jailbreak Joe 4865 Black Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 2 4865 TrLtBlue Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 1 missing from the inventory: 4864a Panel 1x2x2 with Solid Studs Black/2 Trlite Blue/1 3176 Plate 3x2 with Hole Black/1 3666 White (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Five micro skyscrapers
|
|
I really like how you built the (URL) St. Louis Arch> with all regular slopes. It's a pity that LEGO has never made a 65° inverted slope. David (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) I would choose LDView over POV-Ray and L3P in an instant if the -SaveAlpha option worked on my Mac. Otherwise, I think your conclusions about the appearance settings are correct. LDView renderings like your example look great. Would it make (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
