 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Something that doesn't require *dozens* of batteries to have a display with a few operating trains for a weekend. (/cry/) Small size motors, for smaller MOCs. The existing 9volt train motor is a good size. Ability to have more than one motor (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | set technic
|
|
ciao a tutti! vendo questi set, naturalmente completi ((URL) con scatola in ottimo stato, senza coperchio interno in plastica e istruzioni MAI sfogliate 75 euro. 8431 aperto mai montato, con sacchetti ancora sigillati 95 euro. 8458 montata due (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug.market)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) 9V is not dead, believe me. In my club, some guys exhibits large 12V layouts!! TLC discontinue 9V, but the community for sure will support it for long. (...) Thank you very much for your interest. (...) I hope so. I can't say for sure it will (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) I know how you feel, my recent re-involvement in the hobby has come to a screeching halt. (...) Be sure to tell those interested that the 9V system is discontinued. After all, this is the calamity of the LEGO Group -- they brought this upon (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) <snip> How ironic to launch on the day when 9V is declared dead... Still I'm happy to see the release of the first issue. I've been looking forward to it ever since I spotted the first picture on Brickshelf back in April. Does this mean the (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Well, this is something of a blow to the LTC's doing shows. If the decision has been made to discontinue the line and work on a replacment, let us be proactive, and indicate the positives of the 9V system that should be worked into a new (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
At last we now know why our concerns over 9v trains were never on the original LEGO Ambassadors’ Official “Issues” List. I've known the writing was on the wall for a long time now, but even with that knowledge the blow wasn't any less hard to me. As (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) I believe this to be a very bad decision, to discontinue the 9volt system at this time. Perhaps the new electrical system will be better, but at this time, it is still in the planning stage and is curently scheduled to be out in 2009. What do (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Railbricks numero 1
|
|
(il brickjournal dei treni, per intenderci) (URL) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug, FTX)
|
| |
| | LEGO 9V Train Communication
|
|
Billund, 1 Ottobre 2007 Molti di voi sono consapevoli della discussione in corso sui treni 9v. Ringraziamo tutti coloro che hanno fornito informazioni o consigli direttamente a noi o tramite altri canali. Sulla base di scelte strategiche e dopo la (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I second. -Orion (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Heddal Stavechurch
|
|
Hi, I just uploaded some pictures of my latest building, build after the Stavechurch of Heddal - Notodden - Norway, located at abouth 60 km West of Oslo. After moderation, you can find them here: (2 URLs) To remain a minimum of 'arches' in the (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.build.arch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
First issue looks great guys. Congratulations on getting it all together. :) Steve (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
I think a part should only have one AUTHOR line (although, as you say, this is not stated in the library header spec) If a part has two or more authors, it falls into one of two possibilities a) Original author and one or more part modifier/updaters (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) It does not make sense in strictly monetary terms for TLG to continue to produce a line that is not directly profitable. However, we have raised the point before that numerous intangible benefits arise from the 9V Train line. Community (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) And needless to say, I accept ;-) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate myself (parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate Lars C. Hassing (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The current IR trains will remain in the assortment for the time being. They will eventually be replaced by the new Power Function System as well. Steve (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate Travis Cobbs (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
