 | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I second. -Orion (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Heddal Stavechurch
|
|
Hi, I just uploaded some pictures of my latest building, build after the Stavechurch of Heddal - Notodden - Norway, located at abouth 60 km West of Oslo. After moderation, you can find them here: (2 URLs) To remain a minimum of 'arches' in the (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.build.arch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
First issue looks great guys. Congratulations on getting it all together. :) Steve (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
I think a part should only have one AUTHOR line (although, as you say, this is not stated in the library header spec) If a part has two or more authors, it falls into one of two possibilities a) Original author and one or more part modifier/updaters (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) It does not make sense in strictly monetary terms for TLG to continue to produce a line that is not directly profitable. However, we have raised the point before that numerous intangible benefits arise from the 9V Train line. Community (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) And needless to say, I accept ;-) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate myself (parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate Lars C. Hassing (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The current IR trains will remain in the assortment for the time being. They will eventually be replaced by the new Power Function System as well. Steve (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate Travis Cobbs (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
I, William Howard, nominate Ross Crawford (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) I wonder if this means a hiatus in selling trains this year and next or whether Lego will continue to sell the IR trains during the next two Christmas seasons (trains seem to be featured most at this time). -- Thomas Main (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) good question. while working on the new system its going to be very important that it be as backwards compatible as possible. L-gauge will not go away. the new system will be able to incorporate track from 9v and plastic rails into it. we'll (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Nope, sorry. No update. As far as I can tell, ldglite[1] won't recognize colors like 71 and 72. (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The truth is finally revealed (...) No matter how much 'AFOL input' there is, it will be the decision of the company in the end (of course) (...) Exclusively plastic track means reliance on batteries, there is no other way around it. And the (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | LDMerge 1.0
|
|
LDMerge is a console tool for managing multiple LDraw part libraries. It permits the contents of one or more library to be merged into another library and subsequently unmerged with minimum hassle. (URL) works with Mac OS X, Windows, and other (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Good question for those, like me, without much of a train collection (yet). I guess I could be considered "lucky" that I don't have the investment in track and accessories but I cannot even do much more than a really big oval with what I have. (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
Well I posted this announcement at the (URL) site... Personally, I have to say that I have doubts that any battery powered system will meet the needs of clubs doing shows. Even a robust, rechargable battery system has considerable limitations. (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
Hello Steve, (...) Any news about this? I have submitted a new part with the same color scheme ((URL) problem remains :-( Philo (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) In some industries (e.g., integrated circuits) they do a "final build" before taking a product to end-of-life. They announce the final build, take orders, and then perform that one last production run. This keeps customers happy and allows (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
