|
|
 | | new release???
|
| Hi, I've been wondering why there hasn't been put out a newer release than 990330, especially since the rotation sensors doesn't work in it. But the error was identified way back in April by Mario Ferrari ((URL) STATE_0_VALUE (ds_unscale(1023U)) ... (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Use a RCX as a Sensor port AND a Motor Output!
|
| Ooops, subject should have been: Use RCX Sensor Port as a Sensor Port AND a Motor Output! Dave (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Use a RCX as a Sensor port AND a Motor Output!
|
| So, I was messing around w/ the RCX and hooked up a Micromotor to one of my output ports and lo and behold....I could control the motor by toggling the Sensor Type for that port between a Passive (None, Switch, Temp) mode = OFF and an Active Mode (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Lego dagli USA
|
| Mario Ferrari <mario.ferrari@edis.it> wrote in message news:FH2A46.9vv@lugnet.com... (...) quella (...) Sei convinto, quindi, che queste siano una "bufala"? Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote.... (...) Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@sbase1.com> (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
| | | | | Re: robotic rovers
|
| (...) Have you tried combining the inputs of the two output motors into a differential? If the inputs are counter-rotating, the net differential body rotation will tell you which side is moving faster, ie: Motor A ------> Differential <--(Reversed (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
group
lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)
|
