 | | Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(...) And apparently my ability to ask questions far supersedes my ability to follow links. I see you've written a handy paper to explain the method. Thanks. Tim (19 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(...) Hi Bram, Some excellent algorithmic design there. Are you sure you shouldn't be doing combinatorics rather than engineering? A few questions about it: 1) Is the whole thing algorithmic or do you have to specify where your snot-centers (I see (...) (19 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(URL) Click the pic for more info Here's some more examples of my software at work, rendered in POV-Ray: (URL) Here's how studs-out building compares to studs-up: (URL) Enjoy! --Bram (19 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.cad, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Almost Holonomic Drive Built With The NXT
|
|
(...) Basically, it's a fancy word meaning that the robot is movable in every possible direction and can spin in every direction. A Killough platform is holonomic in a two dimensional world - it can move forwards, backwards, left and right - and (...) (19 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost Holonomic Drive Built With The NXT
|
|
"Rich Thompson" <rich@robotthoughts.com> wrote in message news:JAAttJ.I8z@lugnet.com... (...) Can you define "holonomic" as that word relates to this project of yours? I looked it up on dictionary.reference.com and it didn't find a dictionary entry (...) (19 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
