 | | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
|
...and then, after lots of testing and verifications, you get the problem of mechanical wear! Some designs are more sensitive to that than others. For example my Archimede screw ((URL) that initially worked reliably is now unusable after several (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) I think you're reading too much into what's probably a translation from the original. It says 'remote control', not 'controller' anyway. 6 for the train, yes. I didn't see inside the remote of David's preview one, but 3 AAs giving you 4.5V (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) I think that's unlikely. More likely they'll just put the new parts on LEGO Factory so you can assemble your own track packs. Clearly, they still can't count how many curves it takes to rectify a point though. Jason R (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD Signal Box for Save 9V Trains Contest (and John Neal)
|
|
(...) The reason that low sloped roof had little bobbles on the end instead of ridges all the way along the top was becaue I only ended up with two 2x2 33° ridges. I think it actually looks better like that. No ridges in LDD though. Jason R (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) Which, functionally, means that straights are $2 apiece. Hmm. I wonder if, instead of binning them, you could use the curves structurally in landscape sections, much like Thomas Rafert has with (URL) makes a ~16x16 grid of bricks to desired (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
