 | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) Oops Eric, I guess sometimes I am not as clear as I should be... I meant, that people asked me those questions after my first post in this thread, and I just wanted to respond publicly, I certainly wasnt questioning the motives of any other (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
Dave, Great post! There are possibilities for Ambassador "insider trading" in Lego, that is true. But with the huge volume of parts that are generated by TLG, I don't have much worry about someone hoarding all the parts. Even with all hoopla about (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) until Clark Stephens recommended to me that route. There needs to be a major announcement on this problem. I wonder how many others have this same problem. Maybe Lugnet isn't dying off.... just a lot of folks can no longer post, and haven't (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) Could be in some cases, because they are having trouble posting to LUGNET. Email posting confirmations are broken and have been for some time, but the problem is not known to everyone, and nor is the solution (use the web link in the email to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Coulda sworn i posted this
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'll have to look at it in detail later (with Ben). What exactly is the phrase that they keep repeating? I feel like i'm watching parts of Serinity. While you're wasting your finite number of heartbeats on balls falling/flying everwhere, (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
I am revising the BricxCC GUI a bit and I would like to get some input from users. Do you care about docking toolbars to the left, right, or bottom of the BricxCC main window? In other words, would it bother you if that feature was removed? What (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Watch Winder
|
|
(...) I was sure, one day someone will develop a really useful LEGO machine :) This is the kind of device I will rebuild for my father (76) who collects and repairs clocks and watches. And I will rebuild one for my Wenger GSF Field Autoquarz. Thanks (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: <snip> (...) I took your motivation as asking legitimate questions regarding a legitimate issue. (...) <snip (...) Is it me or are many people 'going underground' where discussions on LUGNET are concerned? (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | The LEGO Watch Winder
|
|
My latest project, The LEGO Watch Winder, is located here: (URL) Have a look ...!! Many of you have visited my site before. But recently, my web-host kicked me out for exceeding my space limit and I had to relocate. So it ain't where it used to be. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) I don't think we can say that improved relations *is* the price we pay for the NDA and the Ambassador programs. I think it's more accurate to say that it's the *hope* and *desire* of most people, from AFOL's to the people at TLC, that the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
