 | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) (URL) (1) (1) all weights in g, not kg (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Based on these results, and adding a third old gear motor, I get 0.8375 LB So, that leaves 0.1625 LB (1)(2) for sensors and parts. (3) the more I see it, the more I LIKE the 1 lb rule! beams and parts are not all that heavy, so 2 oz should be (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) This is a good point which bears repeating in my mind. If TLG thinks that we as LEGO train AFOLs think this will somehow be a BETTER system, then they are (again) sorely mistaken. As Mark said, however, TLG is a toy company, so the point may (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) All masses in pounds (stupid scale): RCX with batteries = 0.56 - 0.60 (depending on batteries) Two light gearmotors = 0.13 Two "old" gearmotors = 0.185 So an RCX with two motors is between 0.69 and 0.785 pounds. Not a lot of room in there. (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) 1. I would not show LEGO trains in public ever again. This is because my trains are bigger than 8-wide, and I would be ashamed to mislead the public by displaying an obsolete product. I'm not prepared to change my sales pitch from an (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
