 | | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) not mistaken... ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Getting back to the problem at hand, yes I do think this is a bug in L3P, the line specifically says include 926.ldr. Maybe L3P should include the extension as part of the inc file name unless it is .DAT? Of course that will break if the parts (...) (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) Whew..... thank goodness you were able to post that one. I was afraid it had been lost to the ages... I was worried that you didn't have any media in your camera, or perhaps the battery had died just as the flash went.... but thankfully all is (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x1 curved slope available in dark bluish gray
|
|
(...) Do you know which one it was? [LEGOSet 8657] contains two in light bley and [LEGOSet 8655] contains four in black as well as two red and two white Slope Brick 45 1 x 1 x 2/3. A great set for parts (see (URL) inv>), even if you do end up with (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) You just seem to have too much fun! And I don't think any of the time was wasted at all. JB ps: Great pics :) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) I read Steve's email as saying that they shouldn't and that the extension doesn't matter but IMO it does. Rereading it, it sounds like the extension does matter but that it shouldn't be used to identify the type of file which I agree with. /me (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) I don't think L3P pays any attention to parts.lst. To be honest, I don't think that it should. It's not an editor that's expected to give you a list of parts available for use. (And to be honest, I think that parts.lst is a generally bad idea, (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) The point is that it is not MLCad which differentiates, it is mklist. Tim (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) But that DOES differentiate between .dat and .ldr by the very fact it has the extension in parts.lst. If it didn't, 3010.dat and 3010.ldr would be interchangeable everywhere. This means that 3010.dat is NOT the same as 3010.ldr but L3P appears (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) No, it doesn't. (...) MLCad has no such restriction - that restriction is put in place by mklist. Go ahead - create parts/3010.LDR, edit parts.lst, add 3010.LDR and a description, it will magically appear in MLCad and be usable just as any (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
