To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *515653 (-5)
  Re: New Loco MOC
 
(...) snip (...) Wow! Awesome work! later, James Mathis (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: One New Train in Two Liveries-- Your opinion
 
(...) Hi, Mat, A Coaster version will be nice. Thanks for the compliment on the design. I will be selling instructions. I'd like to sell the Rail Runner version of the instructions since I am acquiring the license for their livery. The acquisition (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: Spybot built-in program
 
(...) I spent some time recently working on NQC headers which would enable using more (if not all) of the Spybot ROM subroutines and tasks with a NQC program. I haven't done extensive testing of the headers in real programs. I hope there are still a (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
 
  Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
 
(...) Isn't there an official order of preference for where a file comes from (eg. check MPD firsrt, directory second and parts directory third)? If so then the most sensible way of processing would be to go through that, which would ensure no (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
 
  Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
 
I agree and disagree with this. I agree that it would be good (for now) if L3P only substituted LGEO parts for files with a .dat extension. Or, even better, if (a) the file being substituted has the UNOFFICIAL/LDRAWORG meta-statement and states it (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR