|
|
 | | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (...) Excellent question. We did get 2 rounds of answers but they weren't very "meaty". (...) I think as the article said, LEGO are constrained as to what they can say officially/publicly. But unofficially we're getting lots of winks, nods, thumbs (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Today's offer from JJ's Furniture Store: A cupboard
|
| Hello! Sometimes MOCs look rather strange from behind: (URL) me, I'm a link!>> The front side is supposed to look like this: (URL) me, I'm a link!>> (Photographing white bricks is a pain in some lower part of the body. Even if the bricks looked (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build, FTX) !!
| | | | | Re: Which one would you pic?
|
| (...) WRONG!!! try again. Chris (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Which one would you pic?
|
| (...) That's hard to say, it's a personal choice, because the two cars are not comparable in the same market. Mazda 6 (Jetta, Accord, Altima, Civic Si, Acura EL) Acura RSX (Tiberon, Celica, etc) I mean, if it was up to me, I'd pick the Mazda 6 but (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (...) Why isn't TLG giving this sort of feedback though the (URL) forum> it set up specifically for that? LEGO Factory has been out for three weeks, and the TLG reps have yet to provide any answers (other than "LDD will be improved in the future"). (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Which one would you pic?
|
| Mazda 6 or Acura RSX Type S? Derek p.s. it's not for me, I'm very happy in my Element. (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) Interesting. To me, 'bevel' would apply to slope bricks more than wedge/skew bricks. Actually, it seems like a very good term for slope bricks. Hmm, excuse me, I need to go update some LDraw part names... ;) (...) I'm always up for part-name (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) Ha. It is single, but obviously not concave. The "double concave" could be more clearly written "double, concave" or "double & concave". But I'm sure you knew that. DFTT, etc., etc. A truly double-concave part would be interesting -- only two (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Ship: Harlequin
|
| (...) Yes, I think some people here have been stuck in orbit around Sirius. In the week that Bonktron emerges from below the asteroid belt, who would have imagined a flotilla of similar shaped craft would follow. (...) The classic smiley looks like (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (URL) For those of you following the efforts of LDD users in streamlining the bag use in LDD, CNET published a cool article about it, and LEGO's reaction to their work. Quoted are Dan Malec, Larry Pieniazek, and Jake McKee (among others). I find it (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
|
