To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *509773 (-5)
  Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
 
(...) Sure! Some assembly required! (URL) (...) Kev (21 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Lego Train Factory - "preliminary wagon design"
 
(...) Is there even going to be a new motor? You could theoretically stick an ordinary battery box in the train, power a sensor/controller unit from the battery, then that feeds power into the top of a standard motor. If the receiver is separate (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Brickfest Pneumatic Master and new Pneumatic Gate Circuits
 
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote: [SNIP] Hi Mark, (...) I figured that if you're going to write an article for BrickJournal on pneumatic basics up through sequencers, you would probably want to talk about the simplest gates, the single output (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.events.brickfest)
 
  Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
 
(...) That just isn't true. Bluetooth units cost in the order of tens of dollars, and who knows how much R&D to set up. Simple infra-red remote control units, to give you on/off or varying control levels cost in the order of cents. Even full duplex (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
 
(...) Actually, I am not convinced it means gears. One of the switches could be mounted with a 45 degree tilt. This would remove the issue of play in the gears. You could also link the handle holes of the polarity switches with a solid piece (as (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR