 | | Re: Legway
|
|
(...) I love to hear about these. I know building someone else's design, and using someone else's code doesn't sound like a challenge, but I also know setting up BrickOS IS a challenge. And besides, it's pretty cool to watch it stand there... Steve (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) Well - I am not thrilled with your references to the train as "el cheapo". Lego is a company that has to make money (the whole point of a company). They are making new trains in a direction that will make the train more affordable to a larger (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) That might be a little expensive to put in a system that's supposed to reduce the entry price! Still, an auxiliary output on the remote control train motor (for lights, horn or extra motor-driven uncoupler) would be a great gift to train (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
Hi, all, I know this might just be a shot in the blue sky, but anyway: Lego is most propably working on a new RCX system. At the Legofan site, there is a discussion about things that should be in a new RCX, and someone mentioned Bluetooth as a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
|
(...) Only one problem...if you link the switches with an axel, they will be oriented such that they are always both on or both off. The on and off positions are 45 degrees out of phase, not 90... The concept is good (at least I think it will work (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
