 | | Re: New MOC: "Bushwhacker" Tank Mecha
|
|
(...) blush (...) Thank you Mark! Yes, I'm trying to get a lot more detail packed into my models. Of course, with guys like you and Soren, among others, I'm learning fast. :-) (...) Yeah, originally they were supposed to fold back 180 degrees into a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | LEGO Braces for Big Changes - International Herald Tribune
|
|
(URL) braces for big changes By Ivar Ekman International Herald Tribune SATURDAY, JULY 2, 2005 BILLUND, Denmark Lego, the maker of the iconic toy building blocks, put this little town on the map. Employees and residents alike cherished the family (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.mediawatch) !
|
| |
| | Re: 8421 first impressions
|
|
(...) Hmm - not a lot more torque, but a huge amoutn of additional consumption, and fairly highly reduced efficiency. The 5292 appears to definately be the American SUV of the Lego motor range. I take it that for heavier torque - it is still better (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub Orientation and Half-Size LDraw files
|
|
(...) Thinking more about it, I wonder if it is a good idea that anybody be able to modify (and possibly screw up) these files. Some (manual) validation should probably be necessary. Philo (21 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 8421 first impressions
|
|
(...) Indeed... more torque, but lower efficiency: (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
