|
|
 | | Re: Nominations for a trainset poll
|
| (...) I doubt a Shay would be possible in 6 wide - even with non working shafts, they have to be beside the wheels, requiring at least 8 wide. (URL) I found> the minimum practical scale was 10 wide. ROSCO (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Nominations for a trainset poll
|
| (...) An aside... is this actually true? Sure, it's their full time job but they have a limited amount of time for any given set to be in product development. We can take as much time as we like. Just sayin... (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Check This Out
|
| (...) I rode it when I (URL) happened across it in 2001> - they have some neat full-size stuff (URL) there> too. ROSCO (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Check This Out
|
| (...) I don't recognize the location- I don't have any 7.5" stuff though... (URL) are more baby sized...both are under 200 lb all up, and will pull in excess of 1000 lb... I don't have any photos of my new toy on the web yet...when it gets here, (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New MOC - Giant cable-stayed bridge
|
| (...) Oooh - a "mine is bigger than yours" contest! (Sorry, couldn't resist!). The design is different, but at our latest GETS show, NALUG's Laszlo Szojka showed a 17-foot bridge using a similar cable technique: (URL) quite the classic cable-stay (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.build)
|
Skipped 5 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.statistics, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)
|
