|
|
 | | Re: More obscure diesel variants (Was Re: BNSF new paint)
|
| (...) Actually, I tend to think that it was more along the lines of the original 1950 plan- try everyting, and see what works and what doesn't work. Just because the FT was great in NA did not mean that it was going to be the best way to dieselize (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 2005 Mecha Pose Contest
|
| (...) thank you mark, you cleared it. Only one entry. Well, so I've to staple my might be entry pics until June 15th to have at least one day to review those hundreds of fantastic new pics and select my entry for the categories. *LOL* - just (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| (...) Nice diagrams Jason (and fellow Michiganian)! I mentioned a 1x6x2 Gothic arch, but I guess it would be too narrow in the middle, a 1x6x3 arch makes much more sense. Maybe even a 1x5x5 half Gothic arch would be nice. One other thing about (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Bricksaic and txt2dat?
|
| (...) OK so a quick search reveals that (URL) autotrace> exports (URL) several different file formats>, none of which I know very much about. Does anyone else have any info? Note: txt2dat relies on the vector data being a series of closed contours. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Bricksaic and txt2dat?
|
| (...) Happy to investigate autotrace input, if someone can point me to a spec, or even better some code to parse it ;) Some test data would be useful too... ROSCO (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
Skipped 9 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.statistics, lugnet.off-topic.test (Skip-filter settings)
|
