 | | Re: sensor defined variable
|
|
(...) E:\winapps\projects\BricxCC>nqc -Susb -q -firmfast firm0328.lgo Downloading firmware:......... ......... ......... Current Version: 00030001/00030208 This is with NQC 3.1r1 for Win32. I hardly ever have problems with fast firmware download (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: On sale or not on sale
|
|
(...) Ah I see - that sounds like one of those "value package" price dealie things then. A packaged value is not really a 'sale' perse I would agree...but it is a 'reduced' price compared to buying all of the sets separately. Bob (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
|
(...) Actually, I have tried making some other ships, got one done, but wasn't very happy with it. however, the next moc I'm working on will be a cruiser-type thing, which will be the start if my fleet. Need to make a dock also. oh, and that tooth (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Translation question
|
|
Thomas: This is perfect. Thank you very much! (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.loc.no)
|
| |
| | Re: Compact dozer design
|
|
(...) Nope - it means if you have two motors which are not perfectly matched (which they so very rarely are), you can still get a straight line. If you build a motor-per-track buggy, and drive it accross a long corridor, then without course (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: "odaibacontest3" Japanese group contest
|
|
In lugnet.build.vignette, Bruce Hietbrink wrote: SNIP (...) There a few more shots of Sigezo's entries: (URL). It's very cool how those 'vignette-y' MOCs were done on a larger scale (even larger than the (URL) guidelines> listed in our FAQ). Too bad (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.loc.jp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Calum!
|
|
Check your email settings! I can't get anything through to you. It's all bouncing back, saying I'm spam. :) Iain (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Compact dozer design
|
|
(...) What exactly is the advantage of using the adder-subtracter design versus the motor-for-each-track design? Let me guess; does the adder-subtractor design produce slow changes in direction while the motor-for-each-track design only makes quick (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
|
(...) How about some of (URL) these> in white lined up on the deck? Great work, BTW. Are you planning on doing any other ships? An entire micro carrier battle group would be pretty impresive. Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
|
(...) well, version 1 was waterline and upwards only, link: (URL) and yes, the scale is to small to make microscale planes, they'd need to be somethin like 2 studs long and 1.5 studs wide, which would be just a little bit hard to do. thanks! -mark (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
