 | | Re: Gundam Head
|
|
(...) My idea was to gather all of the neccessary parts before I start building, as I hate getting in the building groove, only to have to stop and wait for more parts to arrive in the mail. That being said, I probably have enough parts to build the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | How does this ruling affect using Lego in domain names?
|
|
From an article on (URL) CNN>, an appeals court ruled that: "But the appeals court disagreed, saying the Web site was not created to make a profit or to confuse ... customers and potential clients. There were no links on the site to competitors, the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Star Wars LEGO(R) Employee Gallery
|
|
Have you seen this (URL) of Star Wars creations by LEGO(R) employees>? My apologies if this is old news, but I only did a quick search in this discussion forum for "employee" and didn't find anything about this gallery. later, James Mathis (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
This is great. Someone mentioned a few things about how to connect modules. We used the new racer track. TexLUG - SA did this for a children's museum a little over a year ago. They put it on display for about two months in the front window. (It was (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Multi-Terrain Analyzer ACR-10
|
|
(...) Ah. Yeah, that would do the trick. XD -Andrusi && (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto at the Hobby Show
|
|
(...) The ruleset is there, it's just hidden until I do an album. Problem is, with the album, I don't have enough photos. One person emailed me some photographs, but plus the six I have, it doesn't amount to enough. So it'll have to wait for a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Minifigs are bad drivers.
|
|
(2 URLs) Please let me know what you think! -- Nathan Wells (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.town, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
|
(...) Ugh, I can't stand it. We just had a layout that used c-s-c-s-c-s-c to avoid a track overlap, and I felt like puking as the trains went bobbing through it. I can only imagine how those poor minifigs felt. As for the 8-wide debate, we all know (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Encontro
|
|
(...) Boas! Já q o FDS de 31 abril/1 maio é chato para três dos associados, tz o FDS seguinte seja o mais atraente para mim. Peço é q quem o marque q o faça com a maior brevidade possivel para poder preparar a ida (horarios, alojamento, quem fica (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | APRIL 10th Meeting
|
|
Sunday the 10th If you're in the area and you have a chance just stop in, join us! What to expect; Planning and building for the Air and Space Museum Event Show and tell of MOCs and all things LEGO Welcome new guests News from the LEGO stores. Bring (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: Polar Bear Vignette Cube
|
|
(...) That is the weirdest concept for a MOC I have seen, which can only be a good thing Cool (1) Tim (1) not a pun (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, FTX)
|
| |
| | Encontro
|
|
Olá, Na sequência da proposta de novo encontro lançada no site da PLUG, venho propôr as datas de 23 a 25 de Abril ou 7 e 8 de Maio: o fim de semana intermédio coincide com as festas académicas cá do Porto, e como 3 dos membros da PLUG estudam na (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
|
(...) I know. It didn't do much for me either. (...) See above. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Polar Bear Vignette Cube
|
|
Whateverly Labs is pleased to announce a new 3-D imaging technology, which enables us to see the hitherto unseen. We have applied it to the classic 'Polar Bear in a Snowstorm' image. Coincidentally, such an image was (URL) recently presented here.> (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.loc.ca.sk.sas, lugnet.fun, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
|
(...) See below. I've rearranged the order of the bullets to fit my comments. (...) Change to no whitespace characters, this way we exclude tabs, etc. (...) How about: Long file names are allowed. File names may be restricted to 8.3 format at the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
|
(...) I like it Steve. Thanks much. I've gotten problem reports over the last week or so that brought this to light for me. MLCad allows blanks in file names, and LPub percieves them as separate tokens in a type 1 text line, and ignores the extra (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Scout third motor microscout Hack
|
|
(...) I haven't tried it with a program on the Scout yet but the scout uses the third motor commands to send VLL and the Microscout accepts VLL commands when running the "P" program. The scout also accepts motor commands from the LEGO remote without (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics.scout, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Scout third motor microscout Hack
|
|
(...) ...SNIP... (...) Really nice combination! Do you have any sample code, either regular Mindstorms or NQC, that runs the combo. I'd love to try... Joseph (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics.scout, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
|
How about this for a File Naming section to be added to the file spec? (the following text is formatted for FTX display; it will be reformatted for HTML display when it is added to the LDraw.org File Format document) File Names in LDraw The LDraw (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
|
(...) It's not just you. Is the new version of the spec better? It still carries the overloaded definition, but it doesn't rely on it as heavily. The new version of the spec is at: (URL) Can we choose a different word for the textual representation (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
