 | | Re: O-Train
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Cool, thanks! I'm glad you like it. It certainly took a lot of experimentation to get there. Looking back I'm not really sure why, since it seems so simple now. I'm sure prior knowledge of existing solutions would have affected (...) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
(...) are (...) Good question! It's because on the studless beams the holes are right next to each other, whereas on the studded beams the holes have a much larger space in-between. Dave S. (21 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Lego mention in latest WARCRY
|
|
It looks like someone at the Salvation Army is a bit of a lego fan - at least it looks that way :) For the second time in 12 months, Warcry - the magazine of the Salvos - has a lego reference. The last one was about The Brick Testament book. This (...) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | oldest lego technic piece
|
|
Does anyone out there know what the oldest lego technic piece is that is still in use? IE a u-joint, axle, pin etc. (21 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: O-Train
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Thanks! (...) The motor connection works the same way. The only difference is that I had to make some slight changes to accomodate the form factor of the motor. Namely the pin that sticks up in the middle and the two 'hooks' on (...) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
