|
|
 | | Re: O-Train
|
| (...) Jason, I haven't kept up to pace on close-coupling of train cars, but I'm really impressed by your solution. It is low-profile, shared trucks, and looks very clean, simple, and straight-forward. A fresh-look by you without working knowledge of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> This entire conversation reminds me of my high school machine shop classes the first day of Machine Shop in grade 9 the shop teacher comes in, after a brief introduction, brings out this little (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | |  | | Re: How to build a shared library
|
| Hello Anne, (...) You can't. Shared libraries are not supported by brickOS. Shared memory or shared libraries are not a feature of a compiler but a feature of the underlying OS. But you can do it the hard way: - put all shared routines in program 1. (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | |  | | Re: NQC release
|
| (...) I'm apparently very confused. I could have sworn I checked the code here and there wasn't a "private:" before the class Chunk definition starting at line 81. But after double checking just now indeed there is one there. That's what had me (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | |  | | Re: Robolab as a tool for teaching programming
|
| On Wed, March 16, 2005 11:01 am, John Hansen said: (...) My only reason for commenting was that this has been used as an argument before. You've done a nice job of conveying the fact that you're willing to consider that other languages may be (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |