 | | Re: What if.....
|
|
(...) I suggest 5 for the width (hey, half stud offset!), in case someone is swivelingright up to the edge and is using this inside an 8 or larger wide creation. (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) But not one single eensy-weensy bit of NQC ends up in the robot - it's just a tool. This is the HUGE misunderstanding that people seem to have. NQC *isn't* somehow loaded into the robot. Are you telling me that I can't use any TOOLS that (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) I don't follow your logic. Are you saying that any change to the rules to allow non-LEGO programming environments that target the standard LEGO firmware (including ones that they encourage people to use by selling tutorials for them on their (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Wanted to trade: 6090 Royal Knight's Castle for Mindstorms.
|
|
The 6090 Castle is still up for trade if anyone wants to trade it for a Mindstorms 1.0 or even 1.5/2.0 kit. All serious offers will be considered. Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) First off, judging the technical merit of a program of any significant degree of complexity by simply looking at the code (be it text-based or graphical) for 20 minutes or less is nonsense. The only judging of that sort that ought to occur (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-related blogs?
|
|
Hey Allen, Thanks for the comments on my blog (URL). I link to a couple of other blogs there, Jon Palmer's (URL) Zemi.net> and Bill Ward's, um, (URL) Bill Ward>. I'd love to add links to other LEGO blogs. On my blog, I actually just announced this a (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CEO-Letter // The answer
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: CEO-Letter // The answer
|
|
(...) Ben, Thanks. TLG, thanks. I'm one of those who strongly regret the color change. However, I didn't hope for a change back, since the 'damage is already done', as the different shades are already out there. But I was waiting for some point in (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | LEGO-related blogs?
|
|
I saw this post today: (URL) included a link to a LEGO-related blog. I'm sure Bruce can't be the only one writing about LEGO in his blog. So I wondered: Is there a list of LEGO-related blogs somewhere? Or a way to search for them somehow? If no one (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Evolution of the minifig
|
|
Hi Bruce (...) It looks really very good, I think. The only (minor!) thing I think would make a neat addition would be a nod at the ever-increasing number of colours in which minifig parts are available. A 1978 group shot vs. a 2005 one would be (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, FTX)
|
