 | | Re: My First GBC
|
|
(...) I'd say that's a really good start. Many of the modules I've seen have places where the balls get stuck. Considering the number of balls running through the contraption, it's not really a big deal. Steve (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Wow!!! I am utterly impressed. It is as if a responsible adult has come into a chaotic room full of squabbling children and restored order, reason and common sense. Everyone leaves happy. What would make me even more impressed? If the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans
|
|
(...) Verklempt? Did you learn that from Giles? ;-) (...) Yup, need to be done. (...) No arguement there ;-) (...) Let's not leave out Harmony now... or have you done her alrady? (...) ..... and therefore Lindsay (then might as well do all of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
|
(...) If I MUST program a state machine, I could program it to be a small array. Something like this: if(i==0) r=array0; if(i==1) r=array1; if(i==2) r=array2; etc... Self modifying code would be more elegant, but can that be done? If it can be done, (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
|
(...) You CAN program it, or use the state machine structure provided by LEGO (...) You also can use NQC, but I don't know the extent of what's available on the Spybot. There are differences between the RCX and the Spybot. (...) Yes, perfect. But it (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
