|
|
 | | Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
| Well, the combination of non-adherence to advertised values of the product and the legal endowment to return an item for refund if it does not match previously promised core properties could really lead to a case here (IMHO, IANAL). At the end of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10124 Wright Flyer super pris i Bilka
|
| (...) Hej Jesper Tak for tilbuddet, så vidt jeg kan se er det 65% nedsat, så jeg bliver nok nødt til at hente en til mig selv. MVH Niels Bugge (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.dk.kb.kob)
| | | | | Re: GECK:O
|
| (...) Very cool, Nik. Your SNOT is compact and well greebled. The canopy really makes it. While yours is blockier (URL) than the other recent treaded unit(1),> it has a solid utilitarian feel. It's nice to see the old treads again. I've enjoyed this (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?)
|
| Judging by the reactions (or lack of) to my suggestion to move the page to a subdomain called l3go, I guess it'll be ok... Or is it? Last chance to complain before I commence the moveingprocess. Cheers NB (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| Hi John! (...) This, In my not at all humbly opinion, is the core-question in this entire thread. Unfortunately it seems the answer is "It is." (Not only in respect of TLC but in respect of every public statement/promise/warranty/ect. these days, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
groups
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
