|
|
 | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| (...) displays, (...) seem to (...) You could almost say that MUGS has tripled in numbers since it started. There were around 5 -6 of us at the start and now there's around 15 - 20. Numbers at meetings vary, though, and probably average around 7 (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Hey Larry. Just to say that it is not just you. 100% agreed. Thanks for putting my feelings in so well written words. Best regards, Paulo Renato (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Yes, I understand - but did LEGO position it as a collectible? Officially, on their web site? I never read it that way. Jake's post (I could dig it up if it matters) clearly laid out that they were running the last of the existing Maersk blue (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: rarest printed parts?
|
| (...) There are several named beams that would qualify as rare. Here's some of them: (URL) (warning big page) (URL) (warning big page) Most of those are 1960's or before. Some of the rarer ones I've seen are the green prints, the Swedish/Danish VW (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: SPARTAN MK 1 My entry for the Military Hover-Vehicle Contest
|
| (...) Oh, and yes, my pics really do suck. I'm going to shoot some again and put them on the MOCPage. Mike (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
|
Skipped 1 message in
group
lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
