|
|
 | | Re: Pneumatic Arm
|
| (...) Actually the only problem I encountered was a slight twist weakness in the very top and very bottom segments and the physical stress limits (vertically) of the Axles... I didn't actually reinforce it with beams at all.. looked awesome and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Custom Space: Obsidian Stealth Strike Craft for sale - The Brickee Mart
|
| Well... all righty. Being the original creator of this model, let me first say that I'm oddly flattered that someone thinks enough of my design to... well, steal it. On that note, dude, you stole my work. And despite my big, hairy, tough 22-year-old (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, FTX)
| | | | | Re: large technic hook
|
| (...) I have one hook I got in a 2nd hand lot that showed some signs of corrosion. I'm not sure what caused it, but I rubbed it with methylated spirit and it came up good as new. ROSCO (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Pneumatic Arm
|
| (...) That construction would be fine if the "beams" are always in compression, but because the diagonals all slope the same way in each section, it would be prone to twisting failure if you're not careful. ROSCO (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Where from this coupling comes?
|
| (...) It's a standard train coupling that was used in the late 60's. It comes with piece number 3176 (plate 3x2 with hole) or 737 (plate 2x4 with coupling, female). Examples: sets 80, 111, 112, 113, 116, 117, 903,... We had set 112, so I remembered (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
|
