 | | Re: 2002 - My year in LEGO
|
|
(...) I love the sound of this - can't wait to see the 5 figs that go with it (including Mr Bolovsky ;-) (...) Mmmm, definitely my prospective Lego highlight. Richard Still baldly going... (Who also noticed that he ranked 102nd in the 2002 list of (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO AT-AT and Hailfire Droid (Smaller links)
|
|
(...) I think that would be totally in order. We need to see some snowtroops besides in an AT-AT. It would be really cruel of Lego to make them available only through a very large set. I would also like them to make a rebel Taun-Taun with rider and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the big deal about the Mini TIE?
|
|
(...) Hehe, I remember seeing that. I thought "Wow, what a lame set!" But still, business is business. Kind of sneaky, yet funny. ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | 4-6-6-4 "Challenger" (in progress!)
|
|
Just wanted to toss out a link to my current GMLTC project. I'm working on a model of the famous Union Pacific #3985 'Challenger' 4-6-6-4 steam engine. It's huge (64 studs long for the locomotive itself), but it handles the curves on Lego track (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
(...) This is what I had to say... I have been a LEGO® enthusiast since childhood, and I find Fionnula Bourke's report to be offensive in that it attempts to link "The Brick Testament" with the likes of child pornography. Brendan Powell Smith (the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
