|
|
 | | Re: custom decals
|
| (...) Hmmm. Well, often when I need info on stuff like this, I harass people at traditional plastic modeling sites for information. A Google search will turn up a few. (URL) is a good site. BTW, if you read Japanese, I'd advise picking up a copy of (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: The XR20 Tadpole.
|
| (...) Thanks John, I'm glad you liked it. I was goin' for the swift, sleek small ship look, glad it came out that way :D (...) At first i wasn't sure about the canopy and tried a few other ones but they just didn't look right, so i stayed with this (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: the perfect way to sell lego trains
|
| snip (...) snip I disagree, as a child the only lego train set (as opposed to a single vehicle) I could ever afford was the unmotorised 7715 (URL) had a battery motor from when i was younger so used that, doesn't give you the remote control I am (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hi all, Since the code for photorealistic pictures where released (see (URL) a lot of people have been experimenting with it. Allister McLaren for instance added light (see: (URL) which not only looks better but also removes some radiosity artifacts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
| (...) Ah, yes, now I remember. The rest of the manual all showed one dome 1 stud away, but on the pictures both are flush. I just put mine flush, I think it's a typo. I snapped a picture with my camera of it: (URL) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
