 | | Re: Ross Neal's ISCC Contest entry: BN EMD GP-50
|
|
Since he has no activity here on Lugnet, posting wise, I sure hope he at least gets to see these encouraging responses. Ross, you have a telent!!! I cannot believe the models you have created at such a young age. Being fairly inexperienced in (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto13 Multiple Robots and Scoring
|
|
(...) I think we should aim for two, and have four as an option for the rumble after the main matches are on. Calum (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Lame Parts II - Let the building begin.
|
|
(...) I've never actually seen a lego football in the 'flesh', so I'm not even sure how big it is. Is it a standard no. of bricks in diameter? If so you should be able to clamp it somehow with Lego only. But I don't necessarily object to blue tak. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.contests)
|
| |
| | Re: articulation points?
|
|
(...) The trouble with this is that it's not necessarily true. Take 100 Lego turntables and connect them up into a vertical column. By this measure, it has 100 DOF - but as a mechanism, it has no more flexibility than a single turntable (1-DOF). (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto13 Multiple Robots and Scoring
|
|
(...) Maybe I missed something, but didn't I read somewhere that this would be an event where four robots would be run at the same time, one approaching each side of the box? This seems to imply only two. Matthias Jetleb (23 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: NovaLUG 2nd Show (Dartmouth)
|
|
(...) Wow, that is a cool display, especially from people who communicate long distance in planning. You've really outdid yourselves compared to the first show there. Leaps and bounds eh? I can't wait to see what you have in store for the next show. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.ca.ns)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter was Re: Newbie has an idea
|
|
(...) A Lego remote controller would be cheaper than a second RCX. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com> HomePage : (URL) : (4 URLs) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Newbie has an idea
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Depends a lot on how much work your robot is doing. If it's just running the computer with no motors or sensors turned on - then probably 12 hours. If you are running lots of motors and sensors then it's more like 3 hours...but it (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why...
|
|
Nick, Setting the timeslice to a low number (5ms is fairly low), negetively effects overall system performance. Time used by the operating system for task switching is taken away from applications. If a switch takes .5ms (for example) and you switch (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Ross Neal's ISCC Contest entry: BN EMD GP-50
|
|
Incredible, and has handrails too...you've really outdone yourself on this one. The best EMD rendered in LEGO® I've seen yet! -Harvey (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
