 | | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) When my kinfolk (1) try this trick on me, they very quickly find themselves in a different room (or if I can help it, a different building) from where I am. They have learned that this tactic of begging brings exactly the opposite of what they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) I agree, and I also want to extend a Thank You to Todd, Terry, Steve, Leo and others too numerous to mention for their generous contributions to the LEGO community. It is frusterating sometimes to have to wait for the latest update in any (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
|
|
d'Oh! So, what you saying is that I will never be able to get my 7740 (pout)? I better start saving now. Chris (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: people i would most like to build with...
|
|
OK, looks like we are coming to a consensus. Any thoughts on where to meet, time, etc? Scott Sanburn (...) Detroit's eastern (...) Detroit/Ann Arbor area, (...) "Great Lakes LEGO (...) Perhaps a (...) 1x1 round (...) destruction, (...) crosseyed"... (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.loc.us.mi.grr, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
Wow...How nice. I really like this idea. I have been always behind the idea of separating those two universe, but couldn't realise that they could be both "separate" and "together" at the same time. Nice and elegant solution in my side. What's you (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
