 | | Re: Figs with the AT-ST
|
|
(...) The only fig is Chewie. Not to mention, this set is a lot smaller than it looks in the pics. -Todd (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What's Left? (Classic)
|
|
Personally, I don't think they'll do the TIE interceptor, but I think they should do a TIE bomber. That would be sweet. Sandcrawler? I don't think so. AT-AT...I hope so, I really hope so. And I hope they make it HUGE. Not like the wimpy AT-ST they (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Maniacs' guide on adequate.com
|
|
(...) No, I don't think that was it (I never was on rtl). I think it was just the fact that *I* hadn't been there for awhile, made me think for some reason that it was abondoned. But I was obviously wrong. :-) (...) <nod> I know what it's like to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Nuovo Iscritto....
|
|
Paolo Masetti ha scritto nel messaggio ... (...) NON IL VERDE!!!...!!! 8-/ (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: What's Left? (Classic)
|
|
(...) <snips all along> (...) I imagine we'll at least see a play set... the Jawas are highly recognizable. (...) Actually it did appear (very briefly) in the first film. It never appeared in flight, but it was in there. (...) We can hope for (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
