|
|
 | | Re: Someone explain this
|
| (...) Actually it appears he did pay, and got positive feedback for it. The auction ended July 18th, and he got good feedback from the seller on the 24th. Alan (...) (26 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | thanks
|
| Thanks to everyone for their help in finding the sets I need. (26 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.scala)
| | | | | Re: [New Part] Unknown Door 5 x 9
|
| (...) It's from the homemaker sets of long ago, in the hospital and bungalow sets. Alan (26 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: [New Part] Unknown Door 5 x 9
|
| Thanks Alan and Jonathan. I would have found it if it wasn't that the door is 5 x 9 and only 4 LDU thick. It's the door frame that has those measurements (1 x 6 x 10)... :( Well. well, I learned something new. (...) -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: (...) (26 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Suspension
|
| (...) The 'geometric incorrectness' (!) is also true for the driveshafts of course, as the wheels have a fixed distance between them even though the driveshafts change angle. This is not a problem as this design allows the springs to be mounted in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build)
|
|
