|
|
 | | Re: Legal Legal legal
|
| (...) I definitely see your point. This sort of murkiness is, of course, what the civil courts of the world are for--someone has to decide if confidentiality was actually breached. I don't want to get into the wrinkles of Internet copyright law (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Sneak preview of my GEV
|
| (...) Very nice! I wasn't aware there was an actual turret on the SJ games version, but it looks great! I'm looking forward to seeing more of the engine detail--having been an avid fan of Winchell Chung's renderings, these are all the more cool to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.gaming)
| | | | | Re: Legal Legal legal
|
| "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:Fz029E.At8@lugnet.com... (...) leaked (...) talking (...) do (...) it.....why not (...) thing....we (...) keep (...) pell-mell, (...) us (...) Hmm. I didn't make that out of Tim's (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Harry Potter (Film) Set
|
| (...) Sniff! I got books #1 and #2 through the Doubleday Science Fiction book club here in Canada, and had ordered #3. I got a letter back saying that the publisher wouldn't let them publish anymore (including #2), so that I couldn't get #3 that (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) We may have to agree to disagree on this but there is no difference in kind between "deleting on whim" (which I agree you should not do) and "enforcing the T&Cs" (which I think most of us strongly WANT you to do) from a legal sense. In my (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
