 | | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) The 'strange' syntax will be fixed. Those lines will be deleted. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
 | | Some old Town stuff
|
|
I'm selling my old Town Lego. It is pretty heavily played with, but there's still some good stuff, and instructions are included. (URL) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
 | | Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
|
(...) That's been done... Mike Poindexter did it. However it's not clear that it was an improvement, per se. Bigger does not always automatically equate to Better. (also GD&R) Dean my advice to you is not to (try to) improve on my design... but to (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) How about the following name-changes: 6041.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 1.5 Diameter 4617.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter The only other information morphological information would be connection-type, but I don't see a strong need for that. Here's (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
 | | Re: Kennedy Space Center Crawler/Transporter
|
|
Mark Haye wrote in message ... (...) Well done! This is one of the largest Technic MOC's I've seen. (...) Just curious: What is the maximum weight that the platform can safely carry? (i.e. without damaging parts) John (remove the obvious to reply) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.technic)
|