|
|
 | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| John VanZwieten wrote... (...) A general analyzer may be a good idea. As you say, the optimized .dat file can be viewed in any rendering engine, and also, you can run L3P on it. Of course, the analyzer could be compiled into L3P, L3Lab, LDLite etc. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| Tore Eriksson wrote... (...) Uh, maybe. However, if you have a 2x2 brick on top of the 2x4, how do you leave out only half the TOP section? Or you wouldn't? Maybe parts should be broken into subparts for analysis? I think the main problem is, that (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: My Webpage will be up later tonight
|
| (...) Great! Where is it though?! -Shiri (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Adding height to minifigs?
|
| Christopher Lindsey wrote in message <38E1E99C.A09760AE@n...rn.com>... (...) The only effective way I know of is to add lots of accessories to the figs' neck (Backpacks, capes, helmets, etc...). Then place a round 1x1 'dot' on the top of that fig's (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| (...) In this case you could leave out the interior of the 2x2, but you must use the entire top of the 4x4. In the case of solid wall like structures, however, it could reduce 90% of the blocks to no interiour, and no studs. -Chuck (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
