 | | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
|
|
No, no I meant my post as something independent of the stuff you all were discussing, jesting, about. I just want to know the thought process behind 6 or 8 wide. I have followed several threads but it just isn't clear to me. The only thing I can (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
|
|
The width of Lego track is almost exactly the same as Lionel, which is about equal to "O", or close enough for all intents and purposes of this discussion. The last time I was in a train store (1 week ago) I looked at the "O" scale and Lionel trains (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Organizing the LDraw CD-ROM
|
|
(...) So? In many more cases, the VB runtimes will *not* be installed. And the not-installed machines are more likely to be run by the technically-un-savvy. An easy-to-use installer doesn't do any good if it won't run on the majority of machines. (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Bargain
|
|
This must be old stock. This was available a couple of years back. It was good value then too. Phil. Michael Pratt <mpratt@cix.co.uk> wrote in message news:memo.2000020722...k.co.uk... (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Why I think we'll get Stormtroopers + Imperial ships
|
|
(...) into (...) on (...) did (...) I (...) got (...) Maybe blowing up Yavin, a big gas giant, might have taken the Death Star with it?! If I remember rightly (probably not) gas giants are failed suns - maybe it would have taken out everything in a (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb AI
|
|
I made time to provide you with some pictures (took it out of my sleep (...) inspired: I (...) with: (...) the (...) it (...) rear (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LdLite 1.6.1 (maybe)
|
|
(...) I think my problems in IE5 have to do with the 'other characters' that ldlite doesn't like. But that's just a guess. Steve (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC )
|
|
In lugnet.general, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: <snip> (...) I like the clunky, non-aerodynamic "outer space" utilitarian look you have going there. I think a lot of us have a tendency to make our spaceships look like airplanes. The smooth, sleek (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Centipede Train
|
|
(...) bookmark (...) That's Ben Fleskes' Dodecapede train at: (URL) cool model! later, James Mathis (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 2988 Pooh Power bucket spotted
|
|
I saw my first Winnie the Pooh "Power Bucket" in Utah last night. The plastic bucket has a Winnie The Pooh lid. I could not see the entire contents of the bucket but I did identify a unique green duplo plate and a piglet figure. I saw the set in (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.duplo)
|
| |
| | RE: What wheels come in the yellow race car?
|
|
I just happen to have my Indy-Storm at work :> They're the same ones that come with the RIS. The rubber has 49.6 x 28 VR printed on them, and the hubs are a silvery-gray color. (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Extraordinary style + details in a spaceship
|
|
(...) Making new designs is a good thing. I actually like most of the design of the Turn-A. But the mustache thing on the head is just awful. Here's a link, for people who don't know what we're talking about: (URL) should probably take this to (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: dino-craigo-lego
|
|
Craig, I think I was going to ask this of Fanny at the meeting, but we had to run due to the weather: What lenses does she use for the Lego pics? Does she use a standard lens, or a Macro? What focal length? If you could find out for me, that would (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Check this out...
|
|
(...) Well, I see that other LUGNET folks are verifying it as well. so that's fine. I wasn't trying to rain on anyone's parade, I'm just tired of all the bootleg stuff that pops up all the time. I'm sure you guys know what I mean. Cheers, ~Mark (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC )
|
|
Mark, (...) Thank you, Mark. When I built my ADF-800, I was trying to figure out how to have some kind of wing, and I just built the sides on it. These ships can go through atmospheres, but only because of the shields they run. A lot of ships look (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Favorite Lego Train?
|
|
(...) Well, that's what this subthread is about, after all. :-) 5 is too low IMHO and I told you it was to a close friend that I sold a set for 10 so you could derive that 10 is too low too to the general public. The question posed several posts (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Why I think we'll get Stormtroopers + Imperial ships
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, David Schilling writes: <snip> (...) Wampa. (...) Lobot. </snip> I'll be around if anyone needs any more trivial and useless Star Wars info. :^) ~M (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Why I think we'll get Stormtroopers + Imperial ships
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, James Simpson writes: <snip> (...) </snip> Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was that snively Moff Jerjerrod (the guy who greeted Vader on the Death Star) I saw that thing too. I thought it was on theforce.net, but I couldn't find it when (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Empire Analysis : WAS: [Re: Why I think we'll get Stormtroopers + Imperial ships]
|
|
Andrew & All, (...) Speaking of the Empire, my biggest complaint with the SW universe, where I am talking about movies, and not the books, etc. I am not familiar with them, is that the Empire is really ignorant / dumb/ etc. There are so many (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: An Acronym Guide - Catagorized
|
|
(...) The original: NLSO = Non-LEGO Significant Other (well, it might not be the original, but it's the most common) And: SLSO/S/P = Semi-LEGO Significant Other/Spouse/Parent (26 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
