To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trains.orgOpen lugnet.trains.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / Train Organizations / 2607
2606  |  2608
Subject: 
Re: LTC Practices and Specs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:55:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1378 times
  
In lugnet.trains.org, Thomas Garrison wrote:
   So, I would urge LTCs and their Webmasters to consider documenting how the clubs work, and what standards they employ. This information would be useful for prospective members, existing members, people who want to run guest trains, and people starting LTCs who want to know what works and what doesn’t. This might even be good data for ILTCO to link to specifically, so people can compare and constrast how different clubs do things.

Some stuff that I think about when contemplating LTCs:
  • Organization: club structure; officers; meetings; member duties and
  • Operation: layout structure as (a) table modularity, (b) baseplate
  • Table Specs
  • Operating Specs: track clearances, maxiumum car size, maximum car
  • Aesthetic Specs: minimum car size, automobile size, road design,
1 I assume everyone is familiar with these three types of layout organization?

Well, fyi, the GMLTC doesn’t really follow any of these types of layout organization. We would be something more like “layout modularity”, since our layout is designed so that structure, themes, look & feel - all flow from one module onto the next. It would be extremely difficult to fit someone else’s module into our layout display.

But then again, we’re freaks.

As for “Guest Trains”, bring ‘em!! We *love* guest trains, and will happily pull one of our trains off the track to run yours. If it’s too large, well, Sorry! We still want to see it, even if it won’t run on the layout. And since we’re an 8-wide club who build some pretty big things - big things pretty - You’d have to build something rather huge for it to be too big to run on our layout. (John Neal’s 14-wide trains, for example - they won’t fit... *grin*)

JohnG, GMLTC



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LTC Practices and Specs
 
(...) I usually think of the GMLTC as using a form of baseplate modularity---but without the modules (since GMLTC 'modules' are artefacts of building and transportation issues, rather than representing contributions by distinct members). (20 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  LTC Practices and Specs
 
(...) Several months ago, I poked around several LTC Websites looking for information on how the clubs operate, both as organizations and as layout developers. What I found was a dearth of data. Some Websites did have some interesting and (...) (20 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.trains.org)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR