To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4151
Subject: 
Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:16:35 GMT
Viewed: 
1648 times
  
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
Ahh, if you phrase it "What scale are LEGO trains?",a question the GMLTC hears
constantly at train shows, the answer is a quick "L" scale (the GP isn't savvy
enough to handle "MF";-)  What scale it approximates with respect to model
railroading is debate fodder in NGs:-)

-John

I suppose Lego trains could be L6 for 6 wide and L8 for 8 wide.  Anybody else
want to start a Lego Train Scale naming convention?

Mike


Subject: 
Re: 8 vs. 6 (was: Excited to Finally be here...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 10:46:04 GMT
Viewed: 
2189 times
  
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Mike Poindexter (<Fpqzvn.MB4@lugnet.com>) wrote at
04:16:35

In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
Ahh, if you phrase it "What scale are LEGO trains?",a question the GMLTC hears
constantly at train shows, the answer is a quick "L" scale (the GP isn't savvy
enough to handle "MF";-)  What scale it approximates with respect to model
railroading is debate fodder in NGs:-)

-John

I suppose Lego trains could be L6 for 6 wide and L8 for 8 wide.  Anybody else
want to start a Lego Train Scale naming convention?

Mike

How about just AR - artistically right.

--
Tony Priestman


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR