 | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Jordan Schwarz
|
| | | (...) The website is back up, and LDD 2.0 is now available! Cheers! (URL) -Jordan (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re:more bricks in online P@B (WAS: 10183 postponed?) —Jonathan Lopes
|
| | | | | In lugnet.trains, Jordan Schwarz wrote: hours (...) Looks like more elements are available in online P@B as well. Jonathan (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: more bricks in online P@B (WAS: 10183 postponed?) —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | (...) The price of red train doors just dropped significantly! I have been watching this on BrickLink and red trains doors usually run anywhere from $4-$8, the left hand doors being more expensive. Now they are $0.32 a piece! I already purchased a (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: more bricks in online P@B (WAS: 10183 postponed?) —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.trains, Mike Walsh wrote: [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] More "Wanted Notices" arriving today - several BrickLink sellers are now listing them for $4 each! Can't imagine those prices will last long although I am sure some (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Dean Earley
|
| | | | (...) Is it me or have they remove mpd import? (ldr support is still there) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I believe they have. With luck it will be back in the next version. Tim (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Jason J Railton
|
| | | | (...) Unfortunately, LDD 2.0 no longer runs on earlier versions of Windows. LDD 1.6 ran quite happily under Windows 2000, but the new version crashes as soon as you place a brick. It's also a bit mean to write off all the previously uploaded models. (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | | (...) On the plus side, it does seem to run on older hardware. I could only run 1.6 on my wife's laptop which she bought last year. Last night, I was able to install and run 2.0 on my 5+ year old machine. -Elroy (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Jordan Schwarz
|
| | | | | (...) :: snip :: (...) I share Jason's sentiment - I wish they would have kept compatibility with all but the most recent versions of Windows. I guess the software people decided that was the best thing to do. But it does pose an inconvenience for (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Jason J Railton
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, it seems I may have spoken too soon. By going through and updating all of my drivers (I suspect the graphics card driver was the critical one) I've been able to get it to run on my Windows 2000 Pro machine. It freezes occasionally when (...) (17 years ago, 23-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | | (...) [...] (...) ctrl+4 on Windows. command+4 on a Mac [...] (...) (17 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 postponed? —Daniel Aubin
|
| | | | (...) Actually, from my fooling around with the software so far, I can say that there is some compatability between LDD 1,6 and LDD 2,0. When you try to load a file created with version 1,6 with version 2,0 it asks you if you want to try to import (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| | | | |
