Subject:
|
Re: Dutch 1851 - by Joep Klazen
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:39:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2197 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Hi Joep,
Seems that trains is very busy with new posts at the moment. I am curious
why you decided to change to eight-wide. It seems to me that this train is
not gaining anything much from it but perhaps you see future trains as
having greater potential in eight-wide. Of course I am a fairly strict
six/seven-wider so might be biased ;)
|
I think that, yes, your bias is clouding your judgment, because it is
obviously clear why he went 8 wide to model this train-- because he totally
nails the look and feel of the proto by doing it. Compare it to his 6 wide
version. There is no contest here.
Sorry, this MOC is a spot-on for dimensions and in appearance. Well done,
Joep!
JOHN
|
I agree he has the shape 100% down but I thought that for the six-wide version
too. I’ll never quite get eight-wide but these are nice trains, six- or
eight-wide.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Dutch 1851 - by Joep Klazen
|
| (...) I think that, yes, your bias is clouding your judgment, because it is obviously clear why he went 8 wide to model this train-- because he totally nails the look and feel of the proto by doing it. Compare it to his 6 wide version. There is no (...) (18 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
