 | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) That's interesting. I've never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together). (...) Yeah, and bats will fly out of my butt! (...) <shrug> We build to run as well. And you will (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set) —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | (...) Ugh, I can't stand it. We just had a layout that used c-s-c-s-c-s-c to avoid a track overlap, and I felt like puking as the trains went bobbing through it. I can only imagine how those poor minifigs felt. As for the 8-wide debate, we all know (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set) —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | | | | (...) Better that way than having several clubmembers coming to you asking what that stupid big engine did to their trackside structures. (I was the only 8-wide builder at the time and built my engines big, heavy and as overpowered as possible :D ) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, that's what I meant, apologies if that wasn't clear. Steve's right though, you need to stop hassling people about their desires (and they need to stop hassling you about yours)... (19 years ago, 6-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
