|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
I know what you mean. When I see a fine compressed train, as in a James
Mathis creation, the word that comes to my mind is cute.
|
Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a
curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is
ridiculous.
|
Thats interesting. Ive never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is
because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together).
|
If and when LEGO ever makes decent radii, I might switch.
|
Yeah, and bats will fly out of my butt!
|
But
till then, no. I build my models to operate. (that they sometimes have issues
is a different matter, Im not too proud...)
|
<shrug> We build to run as well. And you will see how well in Cincy.
|
|
lol none taken. I realize that many people still love the cuteness of 6
wide trains and fear the big, bad 8 wides;-) To each his own.
|
Oh, get over yourself. Mobody fears you. Or your models. :-)
|
Me??? Youve been hanging out over in CSF too much. FEAR ME AND MY LEGION OF
3VIL BAD GUYS! WATCH MY BLECHA STOMP ON THIS PUNY CHOO-CHOO!
(smacktalksmacktalk) <zzzzz>
What I meant was all of the hysteria that building 8 wides will consume entire
LEGO collections (& perhaps a child or two along the way). Your crack was the
kicker!
JOHN
|
|
|
John wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I know what you mean. When I see a fine compressed train, as in a James
> > > Mathis creation, the word that comes to my mind is "cute".
> >
> > Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a
> > curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is
> > "ridiculous".
>
>
> That's interesting. I've never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is
> because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together).
Ugh, I can't stand it. We just had a layout that used c-s-c-s-c-s-c to
avoid a track overlap, and I felt like puking as the trains went bobbing
through it. I can only imagine how those poor minifigs felt.
As for the 8-wide debate, we all know where I stand, build them big and
damn the shubbery! But, I have been compressing my stuff lengthwise.
When I figured out how long I would have to go to make a super cheif
coach uncompresses I nearly coughed up a lung. Oh yeah, this weekend I
discovered that you can "damn the shubbery" but you cannot really damn
the 7-foot tall building with a 10-wide platform entrance. Prying the
last car back out was fun.
> > If and when LEGO ever makes decent radii, I might switch.
>
>
> Yeah, and bats will fly out of my butt!
LEGO bats? You _could_ do it with LEGO bats.
|
|
|
Christopher Masi wrote:
> Oh yeah, this weekend I
> discovered that you can "damn the shubbery" but you cannot really damn
> the 7-foot tall building with a 10-wide platform entrance. Prying the
> last car back out was fun.
Better that way than having several clubmembers coming to you asking what
that stupid big engine did to their trackside structures.
(I was the only 8-wide builder at the time and built my engines big, heavy
and as overpowered as possible :D )
--
Jan-Albert van Ree | http://www.vanree.net/brickpiles/
|
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
I know what you mean. When I see a fine compressed train, as in a James
Mathis creation, the word that comes to my mind is cute.
|
Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a
curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is
ridiculous.
|
Thats interesting. Ive never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is
because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together).
|
Sorry, thats what I meant, apologies if that wasnt clear.
Steves right though, you need to stop hassling people about their desires (and
they need to stop hassling you about yours)...
|
|
|