Subject:
|
Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:41:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1244 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Thanks for sharing. Really wanna impress me? Do them 6 wide!
|
Really wanna depress me? ....;-)
What point would there be to that?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains
|
| (...) John has a point hear. Why limit yourself to 6 wide when you can do so much more with 8. Hell, why not 9 wide. It gives you more room for the little details and also makes it possible to make the main part of most modern engines 6 wide which (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains
|
| (...) Well, 8wide is "not so much" for me but I think these have captured their respective prototypes pretty well. I especially liked the MK and the Baldwin as they haven't been done so much as ALCO RS units have. Thanks for sharing. Really wanna (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
