| | | | |
In lugnet.trains, Paul Janssen wrote:
snip
|
I secretly, and very selfishly, hope that TLC will not re-release momorail.
|
All bets are off WRT to the momorail ;-), but as far as monorail goes, Brad
Justus was asked point-blankedly what the chances were that TLC would rerelease
the monorail, and his answer was 0%. All parts specs for the motor are lost,
and so any release would have to be completely re-engineered from the ground up.
So, your selfish desire, although no longer secret, is probably pretty
safe:-)
JOHN, AFOFTX;-)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Brad Justus was asked point-blankedly what the chances were that TLC would
rerelease the monorail, and his answer was 0%. All parts specs for the
motor are lost, and so any release would have to be completely re-engineered
from the ground up.
|
Joining in here, I dont get why its so hard for Lego to make a new monorail.
Cant they just put together a new spur gear system (And give the cars real
couplers while theyre at it)? Doesnt seem like itd be that hard.
-Stefan-
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, Paul Janssen wrote:
snip
|
I secretly, and very selfishly, hope that TLC will not re-release momorail.
|
All bets are off WRT to the momorail ;-), but as far as monorail goes,
Brad Justus was asked point-blankedly what the chances were that TLC would
rerelease the monorail, and his answer was 0%. All parts specs for the
motor are lost, and so any release would have to be completely re-engineered
from the ground up.
So, your selfish desire, although no longer secret, is probably pretty
safe:-)
JOHN, AFOFTX;-)
|
Yeah, momorail is funny :). Anyway, the only thing they need to design is the
track wheel. All other parts thy have, a 9V motor, a battery box, and technick
gears. Theyd have to make 1 part that is a regular technik gear, with attached
the metal gear that is at the bottom of the motor. The on-off switches can be
modified (they should because the way they were prevents running a large loop
with multiple stations (buncing back rather than going thruogh dependent on loop
direction etc.) How hard can it be to make 1 metal gear? I can send them one of
my motors, they can measure its specs. My selfish reason for not wanting it
released are two-fold. My current collection is quite large (maybe one of the
largest monorail collections?, challenge me...), with well over 400 track,
(going well over 500 total incl. 200+ straights as soon as my next lot comes
in), 45+ bases, 25+ motors. Second, I paid a pretty penny for this collection
over the years. Resale value of used track will drop like Galidor prices when
they re-relase monorail, but I am now assured they wont :)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.trains, Paul Janssen wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, Paul Janssen wrote:
snip
|
I secretly, and very selfishly, hope that TLC will not re-release momorail.
|
All bets are off WRT to the momorail ;-), but as far as monorail goes,
Brad Justus was asked point-blankedly what the chances were that TLC would
rerelease the monorail, and his answer was 0%. All parts specs for the
motor are lost, and so any release would have to be completely re-engineered
from the ground up.
So, your selfish desire, although no longer secret, is probably pretty
safe:-)
JOHN, AFOFTX;-)
|
Yeah, momorail is funny :). Anyway, the only thing they need to design is the
track wheel. All other parts thy have, a 9V motor, a battery box, and
technick gears. Theyd have to make 1 part that is a regular technik gear,
with attached the metal gear that is at the bottom of the motor. The on-off
switches can be modified (they should because the way they were prevents
running a large loop with multiple stations (buncing back rather than going
thruogh dependent on loop direction etc.) How hard can it be to make 1 metal
gear? I can send them one of my motors, they can measure its specs. My
selfish reason for not wanting it released are two-fold. My current
collection is quite large (maybe one of the largest monorail collections?,
challenge me...), with well over 400 track, (going well over 500 total incl.
200+ straights as soon as my next lot comes in), 45+ bases, 25+ motors.
Second, I paid a pretty penny for this collection over the years. Resale
value of used track will drop like Galidor prices when they re-relase
monorail, but I am now assured they wont :)
|
So it sounds like youre still building your monorail collection. Just think of
how much moolah youd save next year if they re-released a compatible monorail
set. How soon were you planning to take advantage of that resale value anyway?
My grandchildren will have to pry my Airport Shuttle out of my cold, dead hands.
-Chris.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.trains, Chris Phillips wrote:
|
So it sounds like youre still building your monorail collection. Just
think
of how much moolah youd save next year if they re-released a compatible
monorail set. How soon were you planning to take advantage of that resale
value anyway? My grandchildren will have to pry my Airport Shuttle out of my
cold, dead hands.
-Chris.
|
I know, Im not selling (maybe a few stray pieces here and there), but I think
Ill stop buying soon. I just like to think that when I ever indure hard times,
I have something to fall back on. Of course, monorail would be about the last
thing that I would sell (my whistle trains would be the very last thing). Since
I have a few 6399s, parting with the occasional one is possible, but the last
one, as you said too, will have to be pried....
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > All bets are off WRT to the "momorail" ;-), but as far as {monorail} goes, Brad
> Justus was asked point-blankedly what the chances were that TLC would rerelease
> the monorail, and his answer was [0%]. All parts specs for the motor are lost,
> and so any release would have to be completely re-engineered from the
ground up.
Looking at the number of new sets that have come out recently containing
customized eletronics and/or motors, I find this to be a pretty lame excuse.
Many of these sets are one-of-a-kind.
Tilman
| | | | | | |